Index Catalog // Scholar@UC

Type:: Article
Description/Abstract:: An expanded version of "The Future of Conflict: Neurowarfare", both of which discuss emerging neurotechnology, neuroscience, and their implications for war, politics, medicine, ethics, and society.
Creator/Author:: Turner, Grant
Submitter:: Grant Turner
Date Uploaded:: 10/15/2021
Date Modified:: 10/15/2021
Date Created:: 2021-10-02
License:: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Type:: Article
Description/Abstract:: A short discussion of emerging neurotechnology, neuroscience, and their implications for war, politics, medicine, ethics, and society.
Creator/Author:: Turner, Grant
Submitter:: Grant Turner
Date Uploaded:: 10/14/2021
Date Modified:: 10/14/2021
Date Created:: 2021-10-12
License:: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Type:: Article
Description/Abstract:: This is part one of a mini-series attempting to grapple with US grand strategy and the potential need for its re-assessment. The goal of this series is to introduce readers to grand strategy, ideally prompting more to grapple with US grand strategy and grand strategy more broadly. The author is fleshing out their own ideas, so don’t take the work as gospel, but rather as a starting point for your own journey. In part one, an overview of the current state of US grand strategy is given. In part two, grand strategy is defined as a concept, a more detailed argument for the need of reassessment is put forth, and resources on grand strategy are listed for interested readers. In part three, four typologies of US grand strategic thought are summarized and contrasted with what US grand strategy has arguably been since the end of WWII. In part four, some general thoughts on the means and ends of reassessing US grand strategy will be described. Additional articles on grand strategy may appear over time.
Creator/Author:: Turner, Grant
Submitter:: Grant Turner
Date Uploaded:: 09/18/2021
Date Modified:: 09/18/2021
Date Created:: 2021-08-11
License:: Attribution 4.0 International

Type:: Document
Description/Abstract:: The current debates revolving around 5G, Huawei, and how they are resolved, are highly visible indicators of the technology based shifts in the global order which are setting the tone for the 21st century. Currently, it seems that many in the US and the PRC are using Cold War and Thucydides Trap paradigms, with a zero-sum mentality. At least in the case of 5G technology, the UK seems to have taken a more nuanced approach. This article comes as the UK prepares its new National Cyber Security Strategy, reviewing the 5G and cyber security debates surrounding Huawei in a highly interdisciplinary manner, and directing readers to a rich variety of resources. In addition to its analysis of issues and solutions often absent from the discourse, this article’s feature contribution is the argument that the UK can be more than an example of a middle way. Specifically, if the UK scales up and internationalizes its Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Center, perhaps by creating an International Cyber Security Evaluation Center, it can lead its allies and the world in 5G, 6G, cybersecurity, and international relations, filling a vital leadership vacuum.
Creator/Author:: Huang, Russell and Turner, Grant
Submitter:: Grant Turner
Date Uploaded:: 07/08/2020
Date Modified:: 07/08/2020
Date Created:: June 30, 2020
License:: Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Type:: Article
Description/Abstract:: This analytical paper asks, does the One-China policy shape the People’s Republic of China’s foreign policy? This paper begins by briefly defining the One-China policy and situating it in the respective histories of China and its current incarnation as the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Then, after untangling the often muddled classifications of soft, sharp, and hard power, the question is interrogated in the context of each class of power (Nye, 2004; Nye, 2011; Nye, 2018; Raby, 2019; Walker & Ludwig, 2017). This analytical essay concludes that the PRC does employ predominantly sharp and hard power strategies that are heavily influenced by the One-China policy.
Creator/Author:: Turner, Grant
Submitter:: Grant Turner
Date Uploaded:: 07/07/2020
Date Modified:: 07/08/2020
Date Created:: August 11, 2019
License:: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Recherche