Search Constraints
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
-
- Type:
- Article
- Description/Abstract:
- Shortly after the comparative analysis of Codding et al. was published, I prepared a comment on the article that I submitted for publication. In response to feedback from the editors, I eventually revised the manuscript substantially. That revised version has now been published. In this paper, I share the original submission of the comment, which focuses on important considerations for future studies of risk-‐ sensitive foraging. Meanwhile, Codding and his colleagues have published a response to my comment. They exhibit some confusion about my position, which they describe as “paradoxical.” In a reply to their response, I have therefore added some clarifying remarks at the end of this paper
- Creator/Author:
- Koster, Jeremy
- Submitter:
- Jeremy Koster
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/26/2019
- Date Modified:
- 05/27/2020
- Date Created:
- 2012-03
- License:
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
-
- Type:
- Dataset
- Description/Abstract:
- The aims of this study is to evaluate the impact of interactive student response software (SRS technology) in large introductory classes in Political Science taught at the University of Cincinnati. Getting the students engaged in these classes has been one of the main priorities of the College of Arts and Sciences. This study draws on data from Introduction to International Relations offerings from Fall 2012 to Spring 2018, some of which have used interactive software while others have not used any software. Additionally, some offerings have had an assigned supplemental instructor (IS) while others have not had SI. The overall aim is to evaluate whether these instructional innovations have helped improved student performance in this class. The main hypothesis tested during the study is that availability of SRS technology tends to improve student performance during exams. The secondary hypothesis is that the availability of more advanced (second-generation) student response technology (such as Echo 360) tends to improve students performance in class in comparison to earlier (first-generation) SRS devices (known as “clickers”). Background and significance The positive impact of SRS engagement technology on student performance the across different disciplines been well documented in the literature (Marlow et al 2009; Kam and Sommer 2006; Prezler et al 2007 and others). Most of the literature focuses on first generation student response system, also known as clickers (Elliott 2003; Riebens 2007; Crossgove and Curan 2008, Shapiro 2009). Some of the studies focus on the use of this technology without a control group (Beavers 2010; DeBourgh 2008; Kennedy and Cutts 2005; Sprague and Dahl 2010) while others discuss how personal response software impact student performance throughout the whole semester (Evans, 2012). This study differs from existing ones in several ways. First, by collecting data over 5-year period, not only can we compare groups of students using SRS systems with those who don’t but also we can compare offerings using first-generation SRS technology (e.g. the “clickers”) and those using second-generation SRS software (such as Echo 360) that contains more advanced interactive features. Second, the study allows comparison of the SRS impact on different course components and requirements. Third, it evaluates the impact of the student response system in combination with other techniques used in a large classroom such as supplemental instruction or SI. This new setting offers valuable insights about the impact of different types of SRS technology and other interactive techniques designed to engage students in large classrooms. Approach and Source of records Records for student performance collected throughout the whole semester for each student. Demographic information for the students enrolled in class collected from the course rosters and from the University of Cincinnati’s student information system Catalyst ( https://catalyst.uc.edu/). All records are electronic. Those that are not available on Catalyst but are generated as a part of the student performance are currently stored in excel format by the instructor and researcher in an external USB drive which is only accessible to the instructor and PI (same person). No other person has access to the data. The research does not involve the collection of data or other results from individuals that will be submitted to, or held for inspection by, the FDA. No part of the research involves any data that will be provided (in any form) to a pharmaceutical, medical device or biotech company.
- Creator/Author:
- Ivanov, Ivan
- Submitter:
- Ivan Ivanov
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/24/2019
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2019
- Date Created:
- November 30, 2018
- License:
- All rights reserved
-
- Type:
- Media
- Description/Abstract:
- This 7 minute demo reel contains excerpts from several 2006-11 shows including: - Discerning Crane, Herron School for the Arts, Indianapolis, 2010 - NWEMO All Stars, NOTACON, Cleveland, 2010 - Adam Tendler, performing Sonatas and Interludes by John Cage, New Genres Festival, Tulsa, 2009 - Meg Schedel, Odd Nosdam and Why?, SF Cinematheque, San Francisco, 2006
- Creator/Author:
- Woodman, Charles
- Submitter:
- Charles Woodman
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/23/2019
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2019
- Date Created:
- 2011
- License:
- All rights reserved
-
- Type:
- Media
- Description/Abstract:
- Commissioned by the Mini Micro Cinema for the 2017 Cincinnati Fringe Festival – a response to a prompt they provided, “Shudderings of Images Awakening.”
- Creator/Author:
- Woodman, Charles
- Submitter:
- Charles Woodman
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/23/2019
- Date Modified:
- 07/23/2019
- Date Created:
- 2017
- License:
- All rights reserved
-
- Type:
- Media
- Description/Abstract:
- Excerpts from live audio visual improvisation on May 5, 2017 at the Mockabee in Cincinnati, OH. David McDonnell - reeds and electronics Ofir Klemperer - electronics Zach Larabee - percussion Charles Woodman, Loraine Wible, Sayak Shome - images
- Creator/Author:
- Woodman, Charles
- Submitter:
- Charles Woodman
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/23/2019
- Date Modified:
- 07/23/2019
- Date Created:
- May 5, 2017
- License:
- All rights reserved
-
- Type:
- Media
- Description/Abstract:
- Six screen video installation proposal for a church social hall – the black bars represent pillars between the screens in the proposed exhibition space.
- Creator/Author:
- Woodman, Charles
- Submitter:
- Charles Woodman
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/23/2019
- Date Modified:
- 07/23/2019
- Date Created:
- 2018
- License:
- All rights reserved
-
- Type:
- Article
- Description/Abstract:
- This paper presents a prime aspect of Augmented and Virtual Reality development in the field of healthcare. We explored several recent works and articles and a comparison between generic application development and immersive technology-based application is included. The paper talks about more practical approaches that can be taken to enhance the effectiveness of the application. The resources (infrastructure) to complete this study are provided by the University of Cincinnati’s Center for Simulation and Virtual Environment Research (UCSIM). And several experiments and projects in the field of health care are used as a reference to make conclusions.
- Creator/Author:
- Ajmera, Himanshu and Gonen, Bilal
- Submitter:
- Himanshu Ajmera
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/22/2019
- Date Modified:
- 01/30/2021
- Date Created:
- 2019-05-08
- License:
- All rights reserved
-
- Type:
- Generic Work
- Description/Abstract:
- As all of our information moves from print to digital objects we need new ways to validate, cross-reference, and authenticate information. The Web 3.0 is providing us the next generation tools to help connect, describe, and verify that the informational resources we are using are factually related. Like most intelligences this will be automated through AI engines, coded algorithms, resource linking, and accurate metadata. We will explore some of the current technologies (APIs, Cloud Providers,…), open access protocols (Linked Open Data, DOIs, URIs,…), and community initiatives (Semantic Web, RDF,…) The goal of this presentation is to provide an overview of current linking technologies, demonstrate possible integration for your institutional repository, and discuss the future of validation and verification.
- Creator/Author:
- Scherz, Thomas
- Submitter:
- Thomas Scherz
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/21/2019
- Date Created:
- 2019-07-20
- License:
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL)
-
- Type:
- Article
- Description/Abstract:
- Please find within this study package the following items. Contact anonymously.submit@gmail.com for further information or questions. Thanks!
- Creator/Author:
- Niu, Nan and Wang, Wen Tao
- Submitter:
- Wen Tao Wang
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/13/2019
- Date Modified:
- 07/13/2019
- License:
- All rights reserved
-
- Type:
- Media
- Description/Abstract:
- video art
- Creator/Author:
- Woodman, Charles
- Submitter:
- Nicki Davis
- Date Uploaded:
- 07/02/2019
- Date Modified:
- 07/02/2019
- Date Created:
- 2019
- License:
- All rights reserved
