This collection contains data and analysis associated with the International Digital Curation Conference research paper (2018) - Giving datasets context: a comparison study of institutional repositories that apply varying degrees of curation -authored by Amy Koshoffer (University of Cincinnati), Amy Neeser (University of California Berkeley), Linda Newman (University of Cincinnati), Lisa Johnston (University of Minnesota), United States of America
University of Cincinnati Libraries developed various Web 2.0 tools to enhance the Users Experience and direct access to resources through their Social Networking Portals or their browser toolbars.
We developed a toolbar for Firefox and Internet Explorer.
We had widgets for MySpace, Google, and Facebook.
We also had desktop Gadgets for VIsta, Micrsofot Live, and Google Gadgets.
Libraries, archives, and museums have traditionally preserved and provided
access to many different kinds of physical materials, including books, papers,
theses, faculty research notes, correspondence, and more. These items have been
critical for researchers to have a full understanding of their fields of study as well as
the history and context that surround the work.
This figure compares optional and required metadata fields for data sets for four institutional repositories -UC, U Michigan, U Minnesota, and Oregon State
This data set describes the Mann-Whitney U test statistical analysis of the completeness profile for data sets in four institutional repositories. It is a derivative data set from the master data set entitled "Metadata of data sets from four institutional repositories" https://scholar.uc.edu/show/pn89d657h
This data set measures the number of keywords associated with data sets in four institutional repositories. It is a derivative data set from the master data set entitled "Metadata of data sets from four institutional repositories" https://scholar.uc.edu/show/pn89d657h
This data set measures whether data sets in four institutional repositories have digital object identifiers or not. It is a derivative data set from the master data set entitled "Metadata of data sets from four institutional repositories" https://scholar.uc.edu/show/pn89d657h
