The Librarian Parlor (aka LibParlor or #LibParlor) is an online space ( https://libparlor.com) for conversing, sharing expertise, and asking questions about the process of pursuing, developing, and publishing library research. LibParlor provides a community for new-to-research library workers as they consider a research agenda and provide support as they may face a number of challenges. LibParlor aims to address these challenges in part by collecting and showcasing honest reflections, conversations, and how-tos from library professionals engaged in library research. In providing this space, LibParlor aims to spark conversation and cultivate a community of researchers.
This poster presents the mission and vision of LibParlor, how we got started, some of the work we’ve done, and plans for the future. We share what we have learned through the formation of an online community, including the importance of having established workflows, detailed editorial policies, and clear communication between members of the team as well as writers. This poster shares our lessons learned and takeaways for others wanting to start a new group. For example, early on we spent a considerable amount of time developing internal and external workflow documents. However, now our processes are documented and clear for contributors. We would also provide recommendations for getting buy-in from major stakeholders before starting a project like this.
SNU-407 cells were treated with a combination of varying concentrations of MRTX1133 with varying concentrations of either afatinib, sapitinib, or pelitinib for 72 hours. Absorbances were normalized to DMSO control for % viability. The attached files were compiled in data format from n=2 data sets (6 data points total for each combination) and uploaded to SynergyFinder+ with % viability chosen as response.
LS513 cells were treated with a combination of varying concentrations of MRTX1133 with varying concentrations of either afatinib, sapitinib, or pelitinib for 72 hours. Absorbances were normalized to DMSO control for % viability. The attached files were compiled in data format from n=2 data sets (6 data points total for each combination) and uploaded to SynergyFinder+ with % viability chosen as response.
Hearing data obtained using Bone Conduction Auditory Brainstem Response (BC-ABR) testing on six Greater Caribbean Manatees being rehabilitation at the Caribbean Manatee Conservation Center in Bayamon, Puerto Rico. Hearing data was collected while hearing assessments were conducted for clinical assessments of hearing.
Greater Caribbean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) pool recordings from the Caribbean Manatee Conservation Center in Bayamon, Puerto Rico including location and depth of recordings as well as recordings from the natural protected habitat of Laguna del Condado, San Juan, Puerto Rico which includes the GPS coordinates in the recording title. All recordings obtained using omnidirectional hydrophones with H1 recorder (Model SQ26-H1; Cetacean Research Technology, 2007) and are in .wav format.
Greater Caribbean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) pool recordings from the Caribbean Manatee Conservation Center in Bayamon, Puerto Rico including location and depth of recordings as well as recordings from the natural protected habitat of Laguna del Condado, San Juan, Puerto Rico which includes the GPS coordinates in the recording title. All recordings obtained using omnidirectional hydrophones with H1 recorder (Model SQ26-H1; Cetacean Research Technology, 2007) and are in .wav format.
Greater Caribbean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) pool recordings from the Caribbean Manatee Conservation Center in Bayamon, Puerto Rico including location and depth of recordings as well as recordings from the natural protected habitat of Laguna del Condado, San Juan, Puerto Rico which includes the GPS coordinates in the recording title. All recordings obtained using omnidirectional hydrophones with H1 recorder (Model SQ26-H1; Cetacean Research Technology, 2007) and are in .wav format.
Greater Caribbean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) pool recordings from the Caribbean Manatee Conservation Center in Bayamon, Puerto Rico including location and depth of recordings as well as recordings from the natural protected habitat of Laguna del Condado, San Juan, Puerto Rico which includes the GPS coordinates in the recording title. All recordings obtained using omnidirectional hydrophones with H1 recorder (Model SQ26-H1; Cetacean Research Technology, 2007) and are in .wav format.
Data collected for a project under the Dysphagia Rehabilitation Lab at the University of Cincinnati. The manuscript was submitted to the American Journal of Speech Language Pathology and is currently under review. Below is the abstract.
Purpose: Manometric measures of lingual function are widely used in clinical practice, premised on the assumption that lingual impairments affect oropharyngeal swallowing. This study assessed correlations between measures of lingual function and oropharyngeal swallowing impairments using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP).
Method: Participants undergoing routine Modified Barium Swallow Studies (MBSS) were recruited if able and willing to complete the lingual measurement protocol. Post-MBSS, participants completed the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and measures of lingual pressure during a saliva swallow, anterior maximum isometric press (aMIP), effortful swallow, anterior isometric endurance (ISO-M), and anterior isotonic endurance (ISO-T). Correlations between these measures and MBSImP Oral Total (OT) and Pharyngeal Total (PT) Overall Impression scores and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
Results: The final sample included 41 patients (23 men, 18 women; M= 61.75 ± 14.72 years) with heterogenous diagnoses. Analyses showed a moderate, significant negative correlation between aMIP and Oral Total (rs = -0.44, p < .01), and ISO-M and OT (rs = -0.36, p = .02). Specifically, aMIP was strongly correlated with oral residue (Component 5; rs = -0.49, p < .01), and ISO-M with tongue control during bolus hold (Component 2; rs = -0.47, p < .01). No significant correlations were found with Pharyngeal Total, EAT-10 or PAS scores.
Conclusions: Some lingual measurements correlate with oral physiological impairments, suggesting potential utility as clinical indicators of oral swallowing physiology. Further research is needed to explore these relationships across different patient populations.
